|
|||||||||||||||||
TOP STORIESIs a CFA really worth the hassle?1 July 2008COMMENTSIn terms of using it to break into the industry - I think it's probably of minimal use. Relevant experience is far more likely to get you there. Read all comments »New entrants looking to break into the ultra-competitive fund management industry have a significant obstacle in their path: the notoriously difficult Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) programme. The professional qualification comes in three parts, takes four years to complete, and 80% of candidates fall before the final hurdle.
Moreover, as more people take the exams, CFA insiders say the pass rate is bound to fall. A total of 119,000 candidates globally turned up for the final stage three exam this year and their numbers are swelling at the rate of 25% per annum.
Given the difficulty in acquiring the accreditation, it’s unfortunate perhaps that it’s becoming increasingly mandatory. Chris Manfield, managing director and head of the asset management practice in Europe for Whitney Group, says it’s become the norm for new entrants to asset management: “For serious asset management players in the institutional space it is a must-have.”
Whether completing the CFA actually adds to your pay packet is less of a certainty. Some industry surveys have put CFA holders’ salaries 25% ahead of those of non-CFA holders. But Steve Wellard, spokesman for CFA Institute in London, says the issue remains unclear: “It’s not black and white to say that being a charterholder means you can secure more money.”
For new entrants fretting about attaining CFA status, Philip Darling, partner at Korn/Ferry International, says most fund managers will put graduates through the programme, particularly if the parent company is American.
COMMENTSBored yet busy, Compliance / Legal, Tue 01 Jul 08Point to note - according to the CFA institute there is no such thing as "a CFA". Add your comment »LBSMan, Asset Management, Tue 01 Jul 08All those saying it does not take 4 years to complete are incorrect. Dupshar you can indeed take the exams in 18 months, but without 4 years relevant experience you won't be getting your hands on the charter. I think in general some people need to realise exams alone in life are not the path to success. Add your comment »Manish, Asset Management, Tue 01 Jul 08It's a very relevant topic for those who are currently considering their career specialisations. May not be useful to you but it is for others. Add your comment »Anon, Accounting, Tue 01 Jul 08What was news in this? Sorry I am missing something here. Add your comment »Quick Quick CFA, Asset Management, Tue 01 Jul 08I have finished studying every level in the CFA in exactly 3 weeks. Add your comment »Intheminority, Asset Management, Tue 01 Jul 08CFA a "must have"!, i don't think so, perhaps for a graduate with a non-finance background.. or for accountants that need some economics brushing up or vice-versa.. as for CFA v MBA that would depend on your ultimate goals.. Personally, it wouldn't be a criteria I'd use to separate candidates for a job in Fund Management. Add your comment »Anon, Research, Tue 01 Jul 08Manish,
Rosie, Accounting, Tue 01 Jul 08I am currently studying for the CFA, and I find it very relevant to my job and future prosepct. You can passed all CFA Exams in less than two years which is what I am aiming to achieve, but if you don't have 4 years experience you will not become a CFA Charterholder. Some of the negative comments made in regards to this article are plain silly. May I ask, are any of you CFA Charterholder as to the reason why some of you completely disagreed with this article?
noelpotter1, Tue 01 Jul 08I have friends who have spent years upon years studying CFA exams. In keeping with the (rather boring) article, most of them pulled out because they got bored.
AChhagan, Tue 01 Jul 08i think the article is referring to the fact that to gain the chartership, you will need 4 yrs practical experience alongside the exams Add your comment » |
|||||||||||||||||