|
|||||||||||||||||
TOP STORIESThe Insider: When to do an MBA7 May 2008COMMENTSThis talk about Msc...MBA's...its all talk empty propaganda. Used only to stop your career progress by simply using the fact that you dont have one against you. So what if you have one!! Read all comments »Will an MBA really do wonders for your banking career, asks George Trower, our resident columnist and banker on the inside.
The MBA is much maligned. Despite that fact, MBAs are being pumped out in greater and greater numbers and firms are lapping them up offering higher and higher pay packages.
In my own experience, a business school gives you all of the following and more:
1. A theoretical business education. 2. A network. 3. A damn good time if you are up for it. 4. A break to regain some perspective (and sanity). 5. An opportunity to change direction. 6. Higher pay and better career prospects. 7. Access to the most sought-after employment opportunities (at the top schools). 8. Streams of letters asking you for more money for the rest of your life.
However, if you’re already working in banking, is an MBA really worth the two years out of the market and $150k (if you want to enjoy it at least) of direct cost – not to mention lost income?
Possibly not, particularly when you consider that instead of spending two years getting an MBA, a second-year analyst can make it straight to associate and probably be earning more than the starting MBA package in the same time.
How about the network, a damn good time and a good break? They get tick, tick, tick – no argument there.
As for business education, you will certainly learn lots. But the benefit will be greatest if you want to work in corporate finance – if you’re doing due diligence on an M&A or ECM deal, you will probably be able to use your knowledge about supply chains to impress your clients and boss.
However, if you’re a trader, a sales person, a structurer, or anything on the markets side, the roles are so niche that you won’t really get any immediate benefits from the breadth of business education that an MBA offers. Better to do an MSc in finance, which will offer some of the real depth that’s required for your job and teach you how to price derivatives rather than about informal and formal management models.
And yet I would argue that an MBA will be of help – even if you work on a trading desk – further down the line. An MBA will help if you ever have to manage desks, divisions etc. and need to think about more than how much to mark down that CDO, what that stock is worth, or where the short end of the curve is pricing. I-bankers are typically horrible managers: an MBA might help mitigate that.
The decision to do an MBA is therefore about balancing discounted future benefits against current costs. From a pure career standpoint, an MBA will only be worthwhile if you have aspirations for senior management and are happy to slip back a year or two against your peers. The benefits will only come a decade later.
COMMENTSAnonymous, Trading, Wed 07 May 08This talk about Msc...MBA's...its all talk empty propaganda. Used only to stop your career progress by simply using the fact that you dont have one against you. So what if you have one!! Then the fact you didnt go to the 'right MBA school' willbe used against you and your MBA isnt worth the paper its printed on....There's only one thing that really matters, and anybody that denies this lives in another plane of reality..In banking/trading roles where the money is huge there 3 qualifications that count....1.Connections 2.Connections 3.Connections.
Anonymous, Wed 07 May 08I agree. It's all about the "Who do you know?" rule. I was recently interviewed for a modest role at a City bank. Interviewer asked me whether some members of my family were in banking. I said no. And it was a No. I know some people who are less qualified than me and they work in F-O positions. But they've got the connections... Add your comment »MBA alum, Asset Management, Wed 07 May 08I graduated from a top b-school - was and am never really a fan of MBA programs - but 5 years after qualifying as a CA, my career in corp finance cud only go so far
Anonymous, Wed 07 May 08thats why you do the mba - can't you read - for the connections/alumni network etc as well as learning a thing or two! Add your comment »xoxox, Investment Banking / M & A, Wed 07 May 08I disagree entirely. I'm american, never worked in the UK, have no connections, and got a job at a top 3 bulge bracket investment bank in London after graduating from a top 3 american business school. I found the recruitment process to be quite objective and skills based. Add your comment »Market Risk GCC, Risk Management, Thu 08 May 08It means the money spend on MBA is actually on getting good connection, which can be used. Add your comment »Risk Capital, Risk Management, Thu 08 May 08I like to hear more about PhD in Quantatitive Finance Add your comment »anonymous, Thu 08 May 08All for the MBA, not for the connections or whatever else... just to take one year out, relax, and have lots of sex with other Married But Available people Add your comment »Damo, Capital Markets, Fri 09 May 08A PhD is admirable but it depends on what you want to do. To crunch numbers its fine but the higher you go the less relevant it becomes. Armies aren't run by accountants, universities aren't run by math professors. A star trader can earn more than a CEO but it depends what you want. An MBA can transfer to another industry with more ease than a quant who is stuck in finance for the rest of his days unless he makes it big in a Gred Coffey style. Hedge the risk and think what is the most useful if you fail. Unless you can gurantee great returns why not make a living talking MBA nonsense. More chicks and travel. Add your comment »anon, Consultancy, Fri 09 May 08I work for one of this big management consultancies, have been for the last 18 months. I want to move in to Sales or ECM. Would an MBA in a year or 2 be the best option to change careers since I don't have a finance academic background? Add your comment » |
|||||||||||||||||